On 10/27/26 6:18 PM, Greg Burd wrote:
> nit:
>
> s/These functions generally assume that their input is validly formed/These functions generally assume that their input is well formed and valid/
I have not read the rest of the patch yet but as a non-native speaker
the original wording is more clear and your suggested change makes it
seem like "well-formed" and "valid" might be two separate properties.
I think any of the original, "validly formed", or "valid" or
"well-formed" would work.
--
Andreas Karlsson
Percona