Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
Date: 2017-11-03 04:58:00
Message-ID: e71053ef-ebe1-c055-51c8-71fd201c382a@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 11/2/2017 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The SCRAM discussion is spread across two threads mainly with hundreds
> of emails, which may discourage even the bravest. Here are links to
> the important documentation:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/auth-methods.html#auth-password

so that says...  ... [scram-sha-256] is the most secure of the currently
provided methods, but it is not supported by older client libraries....

whats the state of the more popular bindings now?   jdbc, python native,
etc ?

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-11-03 05:12:53 Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-03 04:39:57 Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-11-03 05:12:53 Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-11-03 04:41:52 Re: ArrayLists instead of List (for some things)