From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption |
Date: | 2017-11-03 04:58:00 |
Message-ID: | e71053ef-ebe1-c055-51c8-71fd201c382a@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 11/2/2017 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The SCRAM discussion is spread across two threads mainly with hundreds
> of emails, which may discourage even the bravest. Here are links to
> the important documentation:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/auth-methods.html#auth-password
so that says... ... [scram-sha-256] is the most secure of the currently
provided methods, but it is not supported by older client libraries....
whats the state of the more popular bindings now? jdbc, python native,
etc ?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-11-03 05:12:53 | Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-03 04:39:57 | Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-11-03 05:12:53 | Re: [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2017-11-03 04:41:52 | Re: ArrayLists instead of List (for some things) |