Re: pg_stat_wal_write statistics view

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_wal_write statistics view
Date: 2017-03-24 15:06:50
Message-ID: e6d1c1c5-839c-9223-d818-875045f63c84@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/16/17 1:54 AM, vinayak wrote:
>
> On 2017/03/16 14:46, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>>
>> As the view name already contains WAL, I am not sure
>> whether is it required to include WAL in every column?
>> I am fine to change if others have the same opinion of
>> adding WAL to column names.
>>
> Ok.

So what is the status of this patch now? Should it be marked "Ready for
Committer"?

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2017-03-24 15:10:40 Re: Re: [BUGS] Problem in using pgbench's --connect(-C) and --rate=rate(-R rate) options together.
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2017-03-24 15:04:51 Logical replication SnapBuildInitalSnapshot spelling