Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date: 2023-04-03 06:10:22
Message-ID: e6bb9055-1ae4-64d9-a34a-db141ce69712@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 4/3/23 7:35 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 4:26 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2023-03-31 at 02:50 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>>> But if the ConditionVariableEventSleep() API is added, then I think
>>> we
>>> should change the non-recovery case to use a CV as well for
>>> consistency, and it would avoid the need for WalSndWakeup().
>>
>> It seems like what we ultimately want is for WalSndWakeup() to
>> selectively wake up physical and/or logical walsenders depending on the
>> caller. For instance:
>>
>> WalSndWakeup(bool physical, bool logical)
>>
>> The callers:
>>
>> * On promotion, StartupXLog would call:
>> - WalSndWakeup(true, true)
>> * XLogFlush/XLogBackgroundFlush/XLogWalRcvFlush would call:
>> - WalSndWakeup(true, !RecoveryInProgress())
>> * ApplyWalRecord would call:
>> - WalSndWakeup(switchedTLI, switchedTLI || RecoveryInProgress())
>>
>> There seem to be two approaches to making that work:
>>
>> 1. Use two ConditionVariables, and WalSndWakeup would broadcast to one
>> or both depending on its arguments.
>>
>> 2. Have a "replicaiton_kind" variable in WalSnd (either set based on
>> MyDatabaseId==InvalidOid, or set at START_REPLICATION time) to indicate
>> whether it's a physical or logical walsender. WalSndWakeup would wake
>> up the right walsenders based on its arguments.
>>
>> #2 seems simpler at least for now. Would that work?
>>
>
> Agreed, even Bertrand and myself discussed the same approach few
> emails above. BTW, if we have this selective logic to wake
> physical/logical walsenders and for standby's, we only wake logical
> walsenders at the time of ApplyWalRecord() then do we need the new
> conditional variable enhancement being discussed, and if so, why?
>

Thank you both for this new idea and discussion. In that case I don't think
we need the new CV API and the use of a CV anymore. As just said up-thread I'll submit
a new proposal with this new approach.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-04-03 06:31:55 Re: BUG #17877: Referencing a system column in a foreign key leads to incorrect memory access
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-04-03 06:05:38 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys