| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Date: | 2026-03-17 00:44:45 |
| Message-ID: | e612ab0e-37c9-4dc2-8cec-9c5fe9baf284@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-odbc |
On 3/16/26 4:38 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> Most important - do you agree that those fields should not be in this
> recordset?
I don't see anything here:
that says they should be returned. Though the above also says:
" Additional columns beyond column 6 (PK_NAME) can be defined by the
driver."
That is not the case here, where additional rows are used. However it
does allow for more information to be supplied.
My purely un-expert analysis is, no the extra rows should not be there.
>
> Thank you.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2026-03-17 01:11:26 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Previous Message | Igor Korot | 2026-03-16 23:38:22 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2026-03-17 01:11:26 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Previous Message | Igor Korot | 2026-03-16 23:38:22 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |