Re: allow partial union-all and improve parallel subquery costing

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: allow partial union-all and improve parallel subquery costing
Date: 2021-04-08 14:45:58
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/15/21 9:09 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 12/30/20 8:54 AM, Luc Vlaming wrote:
>>> Created a commitfest entry assuming this is the right thing to do so
>>> that someone can potentially pick it up during the commitfest.
>> Providing an updated patch based on latest master.
> Looks like you need another rebase:
> Marked as Waiting for Author.
> You may also want to give a more detailed description of what you have
> done here and why it improves execution plans. This may help draw some
> reviewers.

Since no new patch has been provided, marking this Returned with Feedback.

Please resubmit to the next CF when you have a new patch.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2021-04-08 14:49:18 Re: maximum columns for brin bloom indexes
Previous Message David Steele 2021-04-08 14:36:36 Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.