Re: Reject access to unlogged tables in contrib modules

From: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Reject access to unlogged tables in contrib modules
Date: 2026-11-09 09:06:12
Message-ID: e55e88c1-3d12-4e8e-970d-827d6e4e8984@uni-muenster.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/11/2026 09:10, Michael Paquier wrote:
> v5-0001 and v5-0002 have both been applied with a couple of tweaks. I
> was not feeling strongly about the need for the TOAST check in
> pageinspect. I suspect that it does not matter with the check for the
> main relation still around, and that's less syscache lookups to worry
> about.

Thank you!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2026-11-09 09:15:46 Re: Clarify wait versus poll behavior in ExecAppendAsyncEventWait
Previous Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-11-09 08:49:22 Re: two statement_timeout race conditions