Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Date: 2018-06-26 08:57:03
Message-ID: e545db68-344c-537f-bbb5-c91f6eace166@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ashutosh,

On 2018/05/14 20:14, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> 0001-Hash-partition-bound-equality-refactoring.patch
> 0002-Targetlist-of-a-child-join-is-produced-by-translatin.patch
> 0003-Partition-wise-join-for-1-1-1-0-0-1-partition-matchi.patch
> 0004-Add-a-debug-message-to-notify-whether-partition-wise.patch
> 0005-Tests-for-0-1-1-1-and-1-0-partition-matching.patch
> 0006-Extra-extensive-tests-for-advanced-partition-matchin.patch

I noticed after *cleanly* applying 0001-0004 to today's HEAD that while
0005's test all pass, there are many failures in 0006's tests. Maybe, you
need to adjust something in one of the patches or adjust test outputs.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-06-26 09:00:03 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2018-06-26 08:47:52 Small fixes about backup history file in doc and pg_standby