| From: | "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? |
| Date: | 2008-07-28 12:41:39 |
| Message-ID: | e51f66da0807280541i43552887p34c2f4ff6b2a5d69@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/25/08, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> wrote:
> I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still
> required.
> http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/
> However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me.
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
Thanks, I applied the patch to CVS, with minor changes:
- Use HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H instead of WIN32 for <sys/select.h>
- Do SHLIB_LINK += instead of separate var.
Could you please test the attached patch or CVS HEAD,
whether everything works fine now?
Btw, do not worry about regtest failure in plproxy_many,
this is due to differences in system random() function.
The test should rewritten, although I have not yet decided how...
--
marko
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| win32.diff | text/x-patch | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-07-28 13:03:52 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2008-07-28 11:53:21 | Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? |