Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Date: 2007-10-15 07:40:45
Message-ID: e51f66da0710150040r64f73ab1qa27b1bf12ba40065@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/15/07, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I notice though that the
> > second of the above-mentioned patches is only in HEAD, which is why
> > those same machines are giving scary-looking warnings in the 8.2
> > branch, eg wasp on 8.2:
>
> The CVS log message for that says "Allow PL/PythonU to compile on Python
> 2.5.", but that is evidently not true. Is this just a warning cleanup,
> or is there perhaps a 32 vs 64 bit issue that is being fixed there?

It's a crash fix for 64bit python 2.5.

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-10-15 08:24:43 Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2007-10-15 06:18:33 Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file