Re: PG-MQ?

On 6/20/07, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
> markokr(at)gmail(dot)com ("Marko Kreen") writes:
> > To Chris: you should like PgQ, its just stored procs in database,
> > plus it's basically just generalized Slony-I, with some optimizations,
> > so should be familiar territory ;)
>
> Looks interesting...

Thanks :)

> Random ideas
> ============
> - insert_event in C (way to get rid of plpython)
>
> Yeah, I'm with that... Ever tried building [foo] on AIX, where foo in
> ('perl', 'python', ...)??? :-(
>
> It seems rather excessive to add in a whole stored procedure language
> simply for one function...

Well, it's standard in our installations as we use it for
other stuff too. It's much easier to prototype in PL/Python
than in C...

As it has not been performance problem I have not bothered
to rewrite it. But now the interface has been stable some
time, it could be done.

--
marko