| From: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pgsql (and mysql) benchmark on T2000/Solaris and some profiling |
| Date: | 2006-05-16 10:01:26 |
| Message-ID: | e4c84c$t7t$1@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Arjen van der Meijden" <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net> wrote
>
> Long story short, we think the test is a nice example of the relatively
> lightweight, read-heavy webapplications out there and therefore decided
> to have a go at postgresql as well.
>
Some sort of web query behavior is quite optimized in MySQL. For example,
the query below is runing very fast due to the query result cache
implementation in MySQL.
Loop N times
SELECT * FROM A WHERE i = 1;
End loop.
> You can find the samples here:
> http://achelois.tweakers.net/~acm/pgsql-t2000/syscall.log
> http://achelois.tweakers.net/~acm/pgsql-t2000/usrcall.log
>
IMHO, without knowing the exact queries you sent, these logs are not very
useful :-(. I would suggest you compare the queries in pair and then post
their dtrace/timing results here (just like the previous Firebird vs.
PostgreSQL comparison did).
Regards,
Qingqing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2006-05-16 10:47:59 | Re: Pgsql (and mysql) benchmark on T2000/Solaris and some |
| Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-05-16 09:48:24 | Re: IMMUTABLE? |