Re: minor fix related to Auxiliary processes and IO workers

From: Cédric Villemain <Cedric(dot)Villemain(at)Data-Bene(dot)io>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: minor fix related to Auxiliary processes and IO workers
Date: 2025-05-07 01:25:07
Message-ID: e4a3ac45-abce-4b58-a043-b4a31cd11113@Data-Bene.io
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 07/05/2025 01:52, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 06:25:24PM +0200, Cédric Villemain wrote:
>> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ typedef enum BackendType
>> * Auxiliary processes. These have PGPROC entries, but they are not
>> * attached to any particular database, and cannot run transactions or
>> * even take heavyweight locks. There can be only one of each of these
>> - * running at a time.
>> + * running at a time, except for IO worker.
> Right. Perhaps this should say "IO workers", no?

Sure, modified this way.

---
Cédric Villemain +33 6 20 30 22 52
https://www.Data-Bene.io
PostgreSQL Support, Expertise, Training, R&D

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-comment-on-auxiliary-processes-for-IO-workers.patch text/x-patch 1.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2025-05-07 01:34:23 Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-05-07 01:18:11 Re: disabled SSL log_like tests