| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rules on table partitions |
| Date: | 2017-06-19 21:07:50 |
| Message-ID: | e496b84a-e4e1-9d4a-6790-881df06afaa6@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/19/17 07:19, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> Currently we allow rules to be defined on table partitions, but these
> rules only fire when the partition is accessed directly, not when it
> is accessed via the parent
That's what I would have expected, but I realize that there are always
multiple ways to interpret things in this area.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-19 21:10:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-06-19 21:06:04 | Re: Getting server crash on Windows when using ICU collation |