Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date: 2023-02-17 08:06:06
Message-ID: e4387c6959c9ed0d6dc9f14e01ff191f3e1a30c0.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 09:59 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I am saying that pg_upgrade should be able to deal with the
> difference. The
> details of how to implement that, don't matter that much.

To clarify, you're saying that pg_upgrade should simply update
pg_database to set the new databases' collation fields equal to that of
the old cluster?

I'll submit it as a separate patch because it would be independently
useful.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yuya Watari 2023-02-17 08:31:45 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-17 08:01:47 Re: recovery modules