Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?

From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov" <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Date: 2007-06-14 05:24:48
Message-ID: e431ff4c0706132224k456d7a5ewbcba2caf6a02bbcd@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/13/07, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not a fan either so perhaps I'm biased, but this seems like a good example
> of where it would be an *awful* idea.
>
> Once you have an XML plan what can you do with it? All you can do is parse it
> into constituent bits and display it.

"...and display it" -- this, I suppose, covers the most frequent needs
(starting from displaying entire plans in some tools and finishing
with odd but useful examples like
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2005-08/msg00046.php).

> You cant do any sort of comparison
> between plans, aggregate results, search for plans matching constraints, etc.

Wrong.

> How would I, with XML output, do something like:
>
> SELECT distinct node.relation
> FROM plan_table
> WHERE node.expected_rows < node.actual_rows*2;
>
> or
>
> SELECT node.type, average(node.ms/node.cost)
> FROM plan_table
> GROUP BY node.type;

XPath can help here. Now almost every language has XML with XPath
support. That's the point, that's why XML is suitable here -- it
simplifies application development (in this specific case ;-) ).

--
Best regards,
Nikolay

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-06-14 07:20:04 Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-14 03:49:28 Re: Can autovac try to lock multiple tables at once?