Re: [PATCHES] build/install xml2 when configured with libxml

From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov" <nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] build/install xml2 when configured with libxml
Date: 2007-06-02 12:59:32
Message-ID: e431ff4c0706020559k21b3d5b4ia045c296fce5b012@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 6/2/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On further consideration I don't see the necessity for this. We don't
> say this about lib-ossp-uuid although it too is only used for a contrib
> module.

And is it good? For that functionality I would also add comment
describing that this "--with..." relates to contib only. What we have
now is not absolutely correct situation when user could wrongly think
that (s)he will have capabilities, just adding "--with-...", but (s)he
won't.

--
Best regards,
Nikolay

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-06-02 13:19:06 Re: [PATCHES] build/install xml2 when configured with libxml
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-06-02 12:41:19 config help neatness

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-06-02 13:19:06 Re: [PATCHES] build/install xml2 when configured with libxml
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-06-02 12:30:58 Re: [PATCHES] build/install xml2 when configured with libxml