| From: | Joey Smith <joeysmith(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Fwd: Interesting performance behaviour |
| Date: | 2004-09-10 22:02:05 |
| Message-ID: | e41f745b04091015023ef1fabc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Accidentally sent directly to Josh.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joey Smith <joeysmith(at)gmail(dot)com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:57:49 -0600
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Interesting performance behaviour
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
> > I see a similar speedup (and change in query plan) using "LIMIT 1
> > OFFSET <anything besides 0>".
>
> So what's your problem?
The problem is that "LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0" has such poor performance. I'm
not so much worried about the query time (it's still low enough to be
acceptable), but the fact that it behaves oddly raised the question of
whether this was correct behaviour or not. I'll try it with a saner
value for effective_cache_size.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-09-10 22:04:09 | Re: effective_cache_size in 7.3.4? |
| Previous Message | Joey Smith | 2004-09-10 22:01:21 | Re: Interesting performance behaviour |