Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()

From: Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()
Date: 2019-07-04 22:08:16
Message-ID: e401642c-8f88-c92b-7f30-15447618c2aa@adv-solutions.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/7/19 17:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Jul-04, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> A possible option 3 is to keep the function in pgcrypto but change
>> its C code to call the core code.
> This seems most reasonable, and is what José Luis proposed upthread. We
> don't have to bump the pgcrypto extension version, as nothing changes
> for pgcrypto externally.

Yes, indeed.

...which means I get another todo item if nobody else volunteers :)

Thanks!

    / J.L.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2019-07-04 23:33:53 Re: Fix runtime errors from -fsanitize=undefined
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2019-07-04 18:56:54 Proposal to add GUC_REPORT to lc_monetary, lc_numeric and search_path