Re: Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listen errors

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listen errors
Date: 2017-03-09 21:01:32
Message-ID: e3a1715d-dd25-d9bb-4a28-6839c242a2f7@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/09/2017 12:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Over in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/201703072317.01345.john.iliffe%40iliffe.ca
> we spent quite a lot of effort to diagnose what turned out to be a simple
> networking misconfiguration. It would probably have taken a lot less
> effort if the postmaster were more forthcoming about exactly what address
> it's trying to bind to. I seem to recall having wanted to include that
> info in the messages many years ago, but at the time we lacked any
> reasonably-portable way to decode a struct addrinfo. Now we have
> pg_getnameinfo_all(), so PFA a patch to include the specific address in
> any complaint about failures in the socket/bind/listen sequence.
>
> For good measure I also added a DEBUG1 log message reporting successful
> binding to a port. I'm not sure if there's an argument for putting this
> out at LOG level (i.e. by default) --- any thoughts about that?

+1 for making it LOG instead of DEBUG1

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-03-09 21:01:46 Re: on_dsm_detach() callback and parallel tuplesort BufFile resource management
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-09 21:01:06 Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)