Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2017-11-30 02:30:13
Message-ID: e2b71438-6553-014f-d56a-2bc423ae10ce@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/11/30 11:18, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I'm working on a revised version of these patches to address recent
>> comments by Horiguchi-san. I will also consider the points above before
>> sending the new version.
>
> Ok, this is fresh news, so I am moving this entry to next CF with
> waiting on author as status.

That's correct, thanks.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-11-30 02:31:19 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 02:26:21 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation