| From: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two |
| Date: | 2026-05-18 18:42:51 |
| Message-ID: | e10e3067-9e95-40f0-be84-de59787bf742@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/05/2026 00:43, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 08:03:15AM +0200, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
>> Right now, awaiting this feature, I use a nextval hook. But it is just to
>> minimise the number of core lines that need to be changed. Neither hook nor
>> callback is a good idea here - sequence source might be only one for a specific
>> table; \d should show an unequivocal definition of a table.
>> Also, the AM machinery makes the dump/restore use cases clear. Logical
>> replication plugins also benefit from it: pgactive, pglogical, and spock all
>> include Auto-DDL solutions that simplify the management of sequence generation
>> methods across instances.
>
> There was zero feedback from other core developers, so it's really
> hard to weigh about its acceptance. My guess is that nobody really
> cares about this thread, which is just the way it is on -hackers for
> some things. FWIW, I still like what I've done in this patch and this
> design.
Ok. So let me just leave the idea of avoiding unnecessary cache lookups here.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov,
pgEdge
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| wire_local_seq.diff | text/plain | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Rachitskiy | 2026-05-18 19:30:24 | Re: [PATCH] ternary reloption type |
| Previous Message | surya poondla | 2026-05-18 16:42:51 | Re: Bug: mdunlinkfiletag unlinks mainfork seg.0 instead of indicated fork+segment |