| From: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats |
| Date: | 2022-11-29 14:05:58 |
| Message-ID: | e101f7a1-ca1d-2f6c-6d9c-5273e7820f7b@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 11/28/22 6:58 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:53 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> I think we should consider deprecating the pg_stat_bgwriter columns but
>> leaving them in place for a few years. New stuff should only be added to
>> pg_stat_checkpointer, but we don't need to break old monitoring queries.
>
> I vote to just remove them. I think that most people won't update
> their queries until they are forced to do so. I don't think it
> matters very much when we force them to do that.
>
> Our track record in following through on deprecations is pretty bad
> too, which is another consideration.
>
Same point of view.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2022-11-29 14:35:12 | Re: Privileges on PUBLICATION |
| Previous Message | Ted Toth | 2022-11-29 13:40:45 | 'Flexible "partition pruning" hook' redux? |