Re: [patch] demote

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] demote
Date: 2020-06-18 16:55:35
Message-ID: e0c986b5-921f-4dff-97c0-eb298aa9196c@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/06/19 0:22, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:41 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>> ISTM that a clean switchover is possible without "ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY".
>> What about the following procedure?
>>
>> 1. Demote the primary to a standby. Then this demoted standby is read-only.
>> 2. The orignal standby automatically establishes the cascading replication
>> connection with the demoted standby.
>> 3. Wait for all the WAL records available in the demoted standby to be streamed
>> to the orignal standby.
>> 4. Promote the original standby to new primary.
>> 5. Change primary_conninfo in the demoted standby so that it establishes
>> the replication connection with new primary.
>>
>> So it seems enough to implement "demote" feature for a clean switchover.
>
> There's something to that idea. I think it somewhat depends on how
> invasive the various operations are. For example, I'm not really sure
> how feasible it is to demote without a full server restart that kicks
> out all sessions. If that is required, it's a significant disadvantage
> compared to ASRO.

Even with ASRO, the server restart is necessary and RO sessions are
kicked out when demoting RO primary to a standby, i.e., during a clean
switchover?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-06-18 17:04:10 Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Previous Message Winfield, Steven 2020-06-18 16:47:29 Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE