Re: review: More frame options in window functions

From: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: More frame options in window functions
Date: 2010-02-12 01:06:16
Message-ID: e08cc0401002111706l5f23b37at12e53883fe020879@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/2/12 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> The real question is whether it's time to bite the bullet and stop
> overloading the opclass infrastructure for semantics-declaration
> purposes.  Are there any other foreseeable cases where we are going
> to need to add operator knowledge of this sort?

Table partitioning with RANGE option maybe?

Regards,

--
Hitoshi Harada

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2010-02-12 01:26:10 Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-02-12 00:24:55 Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks