Re: Proposal for updatable views

From: "William ZHANG" <uniware(at)zedware(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for updatable views
Date: 2006-03-12 15:39:07
Message-ID: dv1f94$1ctr$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


"Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
> Hi folks,
> The supported syntax is
>
> CREATE VIEW foo AS SELECT ... [WITH [LOCAL | CASCADED] CHECK OPTION];
>
> The LOCAL and CASCADED keywords are optional when a CHECK OPTION is
> specified, the default is CASCADED (this syntax creates a shift/reduce
> conflict in the grammar file i don't know how to fix).

Maybe you can fix it like UNIONJOIN. See parser.c.
But Tom said he want to remove the support for UNION JOIN and save the
overhead:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-03/msg00344.php

Regards,
William ZHANG

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-03-12 16:11:53 DB2-style INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2006-03-12 14:56:10 ERROR: record type has not been registered on CVS head