Re: pgstat include expansion

Hi,

On 2026-02-16 13:36:02 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 05:14:01PM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I think now that we rely on C11, we actually could also forward-declare enum
> > typedefs. That would allow us to avoid including
> > worker_internal.h. Unfortunately I think C++ might throw a wrench in the mix
> > for that - IIUC it only allows forward declaring enums when using 'enum
> > class', but I don't think we can rely on that. I think the best solution
> > would be to move the typedef to a more suitable header, but baring that, I
> > guess just passing an int would do.
>
>
> > -extern void pgstat_report_subscription_error(Oid subid,
> > - LogicalRepWorkerType wtype);
> > +extern void pgstat_report_subscription_error(Oid subid, int wtype);
>
> FWIW, I like some type enforcements when it comes to such report
> routines. That avoids some careless assignments.

In theory I agree (I after all did suggest moving the typedef to a better
header). However, the type enforcement argument IMO is somewhat bogus, as C
doesn't really have strong enum types, therefore you can just pass pretty
random stuff. I do wish C enums could be stronger...

> This is usually a sign of header refactoring to me, where the "light"
> declarations ought to be moved into an independent header that can be fed
> back to other places, like this one. An enum declaration or a set of
> constants can be usually worth a split if their knowledge gets a lot across
> the tree. That's just to say that while I agree about reducing the header
> footprint, I don't find the result presented here to be the best thing we
> can do.

I literally wrote that it isn't the best solution in the quoted portion above
and suggested moving the typedef to a different header? I was hoping the
author of the code would do that...

Greetings,

Andres Freund