Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1

From: "Andrus" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1
Date: 2005-11-22 19:01:25
Message-ID: dlvpuh$7fi$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jim,

> Keep in mind that if analyze has never been run on a table the database
> will assume 1000 rows, which is definately off from 122 rows.

autovacuum processes this tabele regularly.
I believed that autovacuum can update the row count to be real.

> You might want to ask on the pgAdmin list. Though I'd recommend against
> calling the guru 'stupid' over there. :)

I'm creating application which upsizes existing data to new postgres 8.1
database.

Will I need to run VACUUM ANALYZE after upsizing ?

Must I enable statitics collection for this database ?

Andrus.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-11-22 19:12:51 Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-11-22 18:53:56 Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1