Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Benjamin Leff <benjamin(dot)w(dot)leff(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources
Date: 2026-01-02 18:48:33
Message-ID: djo3gin42xvkj4nivznxlfgqvncfxk65jqepm573kcnjizu7lr@pe4ci5dzpae4
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2026-01-02 12:43:34 -0600, Benjamin Leff wrote:
> For our use case installing a subset of the tree is sufficient.
>
> In order of preference / difficulty:
> 1) Subset of tree

What precisely do you mean by this?

> 2) Subset of libs / binaries

Why is 1) peferrable over 2)?

> 3) Configure-time switch to only build client binaries

I really doubt there's interest in going there.

FYI, on the postgres list we try to quote properly, quoting the old message at
the bottom of your email, without any trimming, is likely to lead to fewer
responses.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2026-01-02 18:56:42 planner makes provably suboptimal index selection choices with partial indexes
Previous Message Benjamin Leff 2026-01-02 18:43:34 Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources