Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT traffic

From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT traffic
Date: 2005-09-13 00:37:19
Message-ID: dg4sei$ktl$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


"Brandon Black" <blblack(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote ...

Increasing shared_buffers seems to always help, even out to half of the dev box's ram (2G).

Though officially PG does not prefer huge shared_buffers size, I did see several times that performance was boosted in case IO is the bottleneck. Also, if you want to use big bufferpool setting, make sure your version has Tom's split BufMgrLock patch
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-03/msg00025.php), which might already in 8.0.x somewhere. And if you want to use bufferpool bigger than 2G on 64-bit machine, you may need 8.1 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-08/msg00221.php).

Regards,
Qingqing

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alan Stange 2005-09-13 00:38:34 Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT traffic
Previous Message Brandon Black 2005-09-12 22:02:30 Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT traffic