Re: tab complete for COPY populated materialized view TO

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tab complete for COPY populated materialized view TO
Date: 2025-06-30 09:39:09
Message-ID: df596659-ded6-42df-a8c4-af95098989a9@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025/04/11 4:37, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 00:33, David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> They are supported for the From variant; valid completions need only satisfy one of to/from, not both.
>>
>
> Thank you. If so, then WFM, and I don't have any more objections.

I've pushed the patch. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Nordström 2025-06-30 09:49:01 A concurrent VACUUM FULL?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-06-30 09:35:46 Re: doc: explain pgstatindex fragmentation