Re: [PATCH] Expand character set for ltree labels

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Garen Torikian <gjtorikian(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand character set for ltree labels
Date: 2023-01-06 21:08:29
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-01-06 Fr 11:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Regardless of the punycode issue, allowing hyphens in ltree labels seems
>> quite reasonable. I haven't reviewed the patch yet, but if it's OK I
>> intend to commit it.
> No objection to allowing hyphens. If we're going to increase the length
> limit, how about using 1000 characters? AFAICS we could even get away
> with 10K, but it's probably best to hold a bit or two in reserve in case
> we ever want flags or something associated with labels.

OK, done that way.



Andrew Dunstan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arne Roland 2023-01-06 21:29:12 Permute underscore separated components of columns before fuzzy matching
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-01-06 20:16:39 Re: Cygwin cleanup