Re: Alter index rename concurrently to

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov(at)mail(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Alter index rename concurrently to
Date: 2018-07-18 13:32:46
Message-ID: de870b41-2e38-47d6-ca88-d725cb86a203@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18.07.18 11:44, Andrey Klychkov wrote:
> If lower locking is safe and possible to be used by default in renaming
> it will be great.
> What stage is solving of this issue? Does anybody do it?

We wait to see if anyone has any concerns about this change.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-18 13:32:52 Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-07-18 13:29:01 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?