Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
To: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-04-25 15:00:19
Message-ID: de4b36f0-a30b-4410-ba7b-e5f4c5915e6f@manitou-mail.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis wrote:

> > (I'm not sure whether those operations can get redirected to ICU
> > today
> > or whether they still always go to libc, but we'll surely want to fix
> > it eventually if the latter is still true.)
>
> Those operations do get redirected to ICU today.

FTR the full text search parser still uses the libc functions
is[w]space/alpha/digit... that depend on lc_ctype, whether the db
collation provider is ICU or not.

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
https://postgresql.verite.pro/
Twitter: @DanielVerite

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-04-25 15:02:25 Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2023-04-25 14:47:19 Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session