From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
Date: | 2016-12-16 00:16:36 |
Message-ID: | ddcfb018-15a9-e998-132b-e33f60133322@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/15/2016 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> You are saying this is more massive than any other change we have made
>>> in the past? In general, what need to be documented?
>
>> I don't necessarily think it's because it's more massive than any chance we
>> have made before. I think it's more that this is something that we probably
>> should've had before, and just didn't.
>
>> Right now we basically have a bulletpoint list of things that are new, with
>> a section about things that are incompatible. Having an actual section
>> with more detailed descriptions of how to handle these changes would
>> definitely be a win. it shouldn't *just* be for these changes of course, it
>> should be for any other changes that are large enough to benefit from more
>> than a oneliner about the fact that they've changed.
>
> Yeah, it seems to me that where this is ending up is "we may need to
> write more in the compatibility entries than we have in the past".
> I don't see any problem with that, particularly if someone other than
> Bruce or me is volunteering to write it ;-)
I'm up for writing it (with help from feature owners), provided that I
don't have to spend time arguing that it's not too long, or that I
should put it somewhere different. So can we settle the "where"
question first?
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-12-16 01:31:14 | Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-15 23:25:03 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in TS_phrase_execute |