| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-05-19 05:01:39 |
| Message-ID: | ddc61438-ef81-2a60-8c31-145e3ddd1701@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/05/19 1:09, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:07 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I would suggest "non-zero positive", since that's what we are using in
>>> the documentation.
>>>
>>
>> Understood, Fixed in the attached version.
>
> Why non-zero positive? We do support zero for the remainder right?
Using "non-negative integers" (for remainders) was suggested upthread.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-05-19 05:01:56 | Multiple table synchronizations are processed serially |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-05-19 05:01:38 | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) |