Re: pgbench - extend initialization phase control

From: btendouan <btendouan(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr, "ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com:" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench - extend initialization phase control
Date: 2019-10-10 04:30:54
Message-ID: dda785d539dbccf1a872461a4fe0ed27@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Fabien,

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
> Date: Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 4:58 PM
> Subject: Re: pgbench - extend initialization phase control
> To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
>
>
>
> Hello Ibrar,
>
>> The following review has been posted through the commitfest
>> application:
>> make installcheck-world: tested, passed
>> Implements feature: tested, passed
>> Spec compliant: tested, passed
>> Documentation: not tested
>>
>> Other than that, the patch looks good to me.
>>
>> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Attached v2 is a rebase after ce8f9467.

Thanks for your new patch.

But I failed to apply it. Please rebase it against HEAD.

Regards,

---------
Anna

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-10-10 05:07:03 Re: Include RELKIND_TOASTVALUE in get_relkind_objtype
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-10-10 04:28:17 Re: maintenance_work_mem used by Vacuum