Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
Date: 2010-03-23 23:30:48
Message-ID: dcc563d11003231630o61ac2c76qccea3256bb3354d0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What about InnoDB?

Depends on what parts of mysql they otherwise use. There are plenty
of features that won't work if you're using non-myisam tables, like
full text search. I tend to think any full blown (or nearly so) db is
overkill for mythtv, and the use of something like sqllite or berkely
db tables is a better fit.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-23 23:35:33 Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
Previous Message Bhella Paramjeet-PFCW67 2010-03-23 23:28:03 Re: tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables