| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |
| Date: | 2010-03-23 23:35:33 |
| Message-ID: | 10261.1269387333@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> What about InnoDB?
> Depends on what parts of mysql they otherwise use. There are plenty
> of features that won't work if you're using non-myisam tables, like
> full text search. I tend to think any full blown (or nearly so) db is
> overkill for mythtv, and the use of something like sqllite or berkely
> db tables is a better fit.
That's apparently also the position of their lead developer; although
considering he's not actually done anything about it for six or more
years, it seems like quite a lame excuse for blocking ports to other
DBs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Crooke | 2010-03-23 23:37:08 | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-03-23 23:30:48 | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |