| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | V S P <toreason(at)fastmail(dot)fm> |
| Cc: | Ransika de Silva <ransika(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Q] single image Table across multiple PG servers |
| Date: | 2009-07-14 19:58:11 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10907141258y4a0e61ebo4c8eee338ff9370b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:38 PM, V S P<toreason(at)fastmail(dot)fm> wrote:
> Hi,
> thank you for the links
>
>
> I read through the presentation
>
> and they did not solve the issue for me -- which presenting a e table from
> multiple
> shards as one single table (at least for reads) for ODBC clients.
>
>
> I also do not think that skypetools do that
>
> they have implemented essentially an API on top of their shards (separate db
> servers)
> that does the table querying. That means that I have to write a separate
> API for every time
> a user decides on a new query.
Just build a view that encloses a plproxy function.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Kempter | 2009-07-14 20:21:45 | Re: [Q] single image Table across multiple PG servers |
| Previous Message | Jamie Fox | 2009-07-14 19:54:15 | Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator |