Re: 10 TB database

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Martin Gainty <mgainty(at)hotmail(dot)com>, tlieberman(at)marchex(dot)com, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10 TB database
Date: 2009-06-16 20:06:17
Message-ID: dcc563d10906161306o3b7a6e1cwfce810906f06b71d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2009/6/16 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2009/6/16 Martin Gainty <mgainty(at)hotmail(dot)com>:
>> would suggest Oracle 11 for DB of 10TB or greater
>> http://www.oracle.com/solutions/performance_scalability/tpc-h-10tb-11g.html
>
> You are joking, right ?
> Better invest that money in paying someone from -hackers to add
> features required, if there will be any !
> Or buy for that heftier RAID, with more disks...

You can throw a metric ton of hardware and development at a problem
for the cost of an Oracle license.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Jones 2009-06-16 23:09:13 Re: Dynamic table
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-06-16 19:59:37 Re: 10 TB database