AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem
Date: 2009-05-12 18:47:21
Message-ID: dcc563d10905121147n51ad355aw9132dddfb6f0a133@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Anyone on the list had a chance to benchmark the Nehalem's yet? I'm
primarily wondering if their promise of performance from 3 memory
channels holds up under typical pgsql workloads. I've been really
happy with the behavior of my AMD shanghai based server under heavy
loads, but if the Nehalems much touted performance increase translates
to pgsql, I'd like to know.

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-05-12 19:15:52 Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-05-12 18:46:57 Re: Any better plan for this query?..