Re: sort_mem param of postgresql.conf

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgSQL - General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sort_mem param of postgresql.conf
Date: 2008-11-12 14:45:40
Message-ID: dcc563d10811120645m6465e07g48924d4eec95b93@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Anyone knows why the "sort_mem" parametr isn't by default in postgresql.conf
> file ? I had no idea it existed before, and we had some hudge queries
> running 1-2 minutes here, doing all sorts on disc, adding sort_mem = 512MB
> to config shortened that to 20s. These are run only ocasionaly, so the
> memory won't be always used - but helps in these few cases .

sort_mem is right there. If you're running an older version of pgql.
I think it turned into work_mem around 8.0 or 8.1

Are you trying to use a postgresql.conf from an older version of pgsql
with a newer version of pgsql?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-12 14:47:47 Re: still gin index creation takes forever
Previous Message Sergey Konoplev 2008-11-12 14:43:42 Re: Very slow queries w/ NOT IN preparation (seems like a bug, test case)