Re: Annoying Reply-To

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mikkel Høgh <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: 2008-10-17 14:23:21
Message-ID: dcc563d10810170723u74cc486byc2890847344ba73f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Mikkel Høgh <mikkel(at)hoegh(dot)org> wrote:
> On 17/10/2008, at 16.12, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Collin Kidder <adderd(at)kkmfg(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was going to stay out of this but I'll jump in and defend him. The
>>> people
>>> on this list are so pedantic, so sure that their way is the only way that
>>> they absolutely rain nuclear fire down on anyone who dares to disagree.
>>> And
>>> you wonder why no one sprang to his defense???
>>>
>>> And, I do agree with him on this issue.
>>
>> I prefer the list the way it is. And so do a very large, very silent
>> majority of users.
>
> And no one messes with the silent majority and their spokesmen ;)

No, no one makes idiotic arguments that go against the RFCs for how to
run a mailing list and then makes the entire pgsql community change
from the rather sensible way it's done to a non-sensical way to
accomodate broken email clients. But I thought that was rather
obvious.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrus 2008-10-17 14:24:37 Re: OR or IN ?
Previous Message Luca Ferrari 2008-10-17 14:22:42 Re: OR or IN ?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Gainty 2008-10-17 14:24:44 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Mikkel Høgh 2008-10-17 14:15:20 Re: Annoying Reply-To