Re: replication with table add/removes..

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Martin Badie" <martinbadie(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication with table add/removes..
Date: 2008-10-08 18:28:54
Message-ID: dcc563d10810081128i25f9471cv81e8092d4094bd1b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Martin Badie <martinbadie(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system that have constant table adds/removes are present. I want to
> make a replication between master and slaves but not sure which one is the
> best solution for that kind of a situation. Since I am new to replication
> stuff on postgresql I am truly lost but I know that Slony is not an answer
> for replications where table add/remove are present.

I think that pgpool might work for this. There are probably some
other "front end" type replication systems that would work too.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabricio 2008-10-08 18:54:40 About pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-10-08 18:16:33 Re: checkpoint_timeout