Re: SERIAL datatype

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Mark Roberts" <mailing_lists(at)pandapocket(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Billen" <peter(at)clueless(dot)be>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SERIAL datatype
Date: 2008-08-25 17:02:37
Message-ID: dcc563d10808251002s37b9cd08m491ec969fb5cfdc2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Mark Roberts
<mailing_lists(at)pandapocket(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 13:53 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> Regular SERIAL type is limited to a 32 bit int. BIGSERIAL uses a 64
>> bit int.
>
> I think one of the things that would be offsetting is the size
> difference between the two types (32 vs 64 bits, 5 foreign keys, and a
> billion rows or so makes for alot of pain).

Well, of course a 64 bit int is gonna be bigger than a 32 bit, but
with alignment issues and on 64 bit hardware, I'm guessing the
difference isn't exactly twice as slow / twice as much storage. And
it's way faster than a GUID which was what I think started this
thread.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Drake 2008-08-25 17:04:13 Re: Dump/restore with bad data and large objects
Previous Message John T. Dow 2008-08-25 16:58:00 Re: Dump/restore with bad data and large objects