| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Loic Petit" <tls(dot)wydd(at)free(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | max(at)nts(dot)biz(dot)ua, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Large number of tables slow insert |
| Date: | 2008-08-24 00:50:48 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10808231750t6b04590bifdf8acc387777c05@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Loic Petit <tls(dot)wydd(at)free(dot)fr> wrote:
> I was a bit confused about the read and write sorry ! I understand what you
> mean...
> But do you think that the IO cost (of only one page) needed to handle the
> index writing is superior than 300ms ? Because each insert in any of these
> tables is that slow.
> NB: between my "small" and my "big" tests the only difference is the number
> of table (10 and 3000), there is almost the same amount of on-disk data
It could be that the tables or indexes are heavily bloated. What's
the churn rate on these tables / indexes?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Loic Petit | 2008-08-24 00:59:16 | Re: Large number of tables slow insert |
| Previous Message | Loic Petit | 2008-08-24 00:47:36 | Re: Large number of tables slow insert |