From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | nalini <nalini(at)nic(dot)in> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres replication |
Date: | 2008-01-10 15:19:58 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10801100719q67aa0432l652d74661bbae5e8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Jan 10, 2008 1:38 AM, nalini <nalini(at)nic(dot)in> wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I have a application running at various locations with backend as postgres
> Slony is configured at all locations for replication at local site anda
> central server where each site has its own database instance.
>
> Now we wish to merge data collected from all the sites into one database
> instance to provide consolidated view
>
> database schema is same at all the places
> However as the application is still under development the schema maychange.
> however the change will happen at all the locations.
I would replicate each one to a different schema on the same server
and then use views to consolidate the data into what appears to be one
set. To make everything unique, you could prepend a unique id to each
identifier based on the schema it came from.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Antonio Corardi | 2008-01-10 17:53:05 | physical memory |
Previous Message | johnf | 2008-01-10 15:12:39 | Re: find the sequence name from schema, table, field |