Re: Experiences with extensibility

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experiences with extensibility
Date: 2008-01-09 19:45:10
Message-ID: dcc563d10801091145m740a647al1d918d458b08df89@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Jan 9, 2008 10:05 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:59:56PM -0700, Guido Neitzer wrote:
> >
> > Easy multi-master clustering with just two machines.
>
> To my knowledge, _nobody_ actually offers that.
>
> There are three companies I know of that have done effective marketing of
> systems.
>
> Company O has a very advanced system with plenty of features. When you see
> it functioning, it is very impressive. Casual acquaintance with anyone who
> has attempted to implement it, however, will yield many stories that give
> the lie to any claims of "easy" multi-master. Some implementors would be
> happy to get to "hard to do, but working" multi-master, as far as I've been
> able to ascertain.

But my account rep told me it was easy, and he'd never lie to me,
would he? <@_@>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Gainty 2008-01-09 19:50:29 Re: Prepared Statements
Previous Message Guido Neitzer 2008-01-09 19:38:43 Re: Experiences with extensibility