Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM
Date: 2007-09-05 15:45:24
Message-ID: dcc563d10709050845k135d3c2erbe5b44933e898aa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 9/5/07, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:
> > Right, additionally NTFS is really nothing to use on any serious disc
> > array.
>
> Do you mean that I will not see any big improvement if I upgrade the disk
> subsystem because the client is using NTFS (i.e. Windows)

No, I think he's referring more to the lack of reliability of NTFS
compared to UFS / ZFS / JFS / XFS on unixen.

A faster disk subsystem will likely be a real help.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlo Stonebanks 2007-09-05 15:57:19 Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-05 15:23:38 Re: optimize query with a maximum(date) extraction